题目详情

Text 4 If the trade unionist Jimmy Hoffa were alive today,he would probably represent civil servant.When Hoffa’s Teamsters were in their prime in 1960,only one in ten American government workers belonged to a union;now 36%do.In 2009 the number of unionists in America’s public sector passed that of their fellow members in the private sector.In Britain,more than half of public-sector workers but only about 15%of private-sector ones are unionized.There are three reasons for the public-sector unions’thriving.First,they can shut things down without suffering much in the way of consequences.Second,they are mostly bright and well-educated.A quarter of America’s public-sector workers have a university degree.Third,they now dominate left-of-centre politics.Some of their ties go back a long way.Britain’s Labor Party,as its name implies,has long been associated with trade unionism.Its current leader,Ed Miliband,owes his position to votes from public-sector unions.At the state level their influence can be even more fearsome.Mark Baldassare of the Public Policy Institute of California points out that much of the state’s budget is patrolled by unions.The teachers’unions keep an eye on schools,the CCPOA on prisons and a variety of labor groups on health care.In many rich countries average wages in the state sector are higher than in the private one.But the real gains come in benefits and work practices.Politicians have repeatedly“backloaded”public-sector pay deals,keeping the pay increases modest but adding to holidays and especially pensions that are already generous.Reform has been vigorously opposed,perhaps most egregiously in education,where charter schools,academies and merit pay all faced drawn-out battles.Even though there is plenty of evidence that the quality of the teachers is the most important variable,teachers’unions have fought against getting rid of bad ones and promoting good ones.As the cost to everyone else has become clearer,politicians have begun to clamp down.In Wisconsin the unions have rallied thousands of supporters against Scott Walker,the hardline Republican governor.But many within the public sector suffer under the current system,too.John Donahue at Harvard’s Kennedy School points out that the norms of culture in Western civil services suit those who want to stay put but is bad for high achievers.The only American public-sector workers who earn well above$250,000 a year are university sports coaches and the president of the United States.Bankers’fat pay packets have attracted much criticism,but a public-sector system that does not reward high achievers may be a much bigger problem for America.39.The example of the unions in Wisconsin shows that unions

  • A.often run against the current political system
  • B.can change people’s political attitudes
  • C.may be a barrier to public-sector reforms
  • D.are dominant in the government

正确答案及解析

正确答案
C
解析

该题根据题干中的专有名词Wisconsin定位于倒数第二段。由题干可知这是一个例证题,所以需要看文章的第五段。第五段首句Reform has been vigorously opposed。从第六段Wisconsin的例子可以看出,工会集合众人反对共和党领导人Scott Walker,正是为了反对改革。所以可以知道工会可能是公共部门改革的一个障碍,C为正确答案。A项“经常与当前政治体系对抗”,文中并未反映出often这个程度。B项中“能够改变人们的政治态度”,文中并未提及。D项中“在政府中占统治地位”文

包含此试题的试卷

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

在社会规范学习与道德品质发展的研究中,班都拉(ABandura)等心理学家的研究重点是

  • A.道德认识
  • B.道德情感
  • C.道德意志
  • D.道德行为
查看答案
问答题

论说文:根据下述材料,写一篇600字左右的论说文,题目自拟。

最近在网上,“美国害怕了”“日本吓傻了”“欧洲后悔了”之类的文章,总能赚取不少莫名点击。在此类文章的始作俑者眼里,标题就是一枚带着诱饵的鱼钩,不加点“刺激”的猛料,就无法吊起胃口。然而,纵观这些所谓“爆款”文章,其内部水平却了无新意,令人担忧。比如,有的一味夸大、以偏概全,高喊《在这些领域,中国创下多个“世界第一”!无人表示不服》;有的任意拔高、贻人口实,鼓吹《别怕,中国科技实力超越美国,居世界第一》;有的一厢情愿、照单全收,将国外的只言片语,放大成“中国在世界舞台上占据中心位置”“中国现在是全球第一经济体”等声音。特别是“跪求体”“哭晕体”“吓尿体”等浮夸自大文风频现,消减媒体公信力、污染舆论生态,扭曲国民心态,不利于成风化人、凝聚人心,构建清朗网络空间。

查看答案
问答题

论说文:阅读下面的材料,写一篇700字左右的论说文,题目自拟。

“我知道我有能力去做一名领导者,但不想承担那么多。”河南开封市某村庄任职的大学生村官说,“在我看来”当配角是一件挺开心的事情,担子没那么重,把自己职责范围内的事情做好,也是一种成就”。“配角综合症”为不喜欢向前闯,甘当团队配角的心理。近日,《中国青年报》社会调查中心对2000人展开的一项调查显示,48.4%的受访者有“配角综合症”。同时,50.4%的受访者表示身边有“配角综合症”人群,其中9.5%的受访者坦言非常多。

查看答案
问答题

是否生孩子是每个家庭都要面临的选择。有人认为孩子是一个家庭必备的成员,但实际上,

孩子是奢侈品.穷人不应该生孩子。

首先,孩子童年容易不快乐。生孩子首先要考虑的便是经济条件,只要家庭经济条件好,孩子就能拥有快乐的童年。如果家庭经济条件差,那么孩子的很多喜好都不能满足,孩子的童年很难快乐。对某地一所中学的孩子进行抽样调查,发现家庭经济条件越差,孩子越容易产生自卑心理,越容易不快乐。为了让每个孩子拥有快乐的童年,穷人就不应该生孩子。

其次,孩子长大后不能拥有好的生活。培养孩子长大成才是每一位家长的愿望,但由于贫穷,家长不能够给孩子提供优质的教育资源,这使得孩子从小便落于人后,长大后也只能成为底层劳动人民,不能拥有好的物质生活,并且世世代代只能重复如此。既然如此,为了杜绝这种事情的发生,穷人就不应当生孩子。

再者,穷人生孩子会使父母生活变得不幸福。养育孩子需要付出时间成本和金钱成本,并且在养育孩子过程中需要夫妻中的一方放弃工作照顾孩子,如此就既减少了经济来源。又加大了经济开销,由此造成,夫妻的生活质量严重下降,生活变得不幸福。所以,为了不降低夫妻的生活质量,就不应该生孩子。

最后,父母与子女之间更容易产生矛盾。一个人的教育水平与其经济收入成正相关性,整体而言,相较于经济条件好的家庭而言,经济条件差的家庭其父母受教育的水平更低。可见,贫困家庭的孩子更容易与父母产生矛盾。

总之,不论从孩子角度还是父母角度考量.穷人都不应该生孩子。

查看答案
问答题

论说文:根据下述材料,写一篇700字左右的论说文,题目自拟。

“改变你的看法,但坚守你的原则;让你的树叶随季节变换,但让你的根稳稳扎在地底下。”在日新月异的现代社会,要如何处理“原则”这一问题呢?

查看答案

相关题库更多 +