题目详情

Text 2 It used to be so straightforward.A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal.A journal editor would then remove the authors’names and affiliations from the paper and send it to their peers for review.Depending on the comments received,the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it.Copyright rested with the journal publisher,and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal.No longer.The Internet–and pressure from funding agencies,who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it–is making access to scientific results a reality.The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD)has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this.The report,by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD,makes heavy reading for publishers who have,so far,made handsome profits.But it goes further than that.It signals a change in what has,until now,been a key element of scientific endeavor.The value of knowledge and the return on the public investment in research depends,in part,upon wide distribution and ready access.It is big business.In America,the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between$7 billion and$11 billion.The International Association of Scientific,Technical and Medical Publishers says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects.They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals.This is now changing.According to the OECD report,some 75%of scholarly journals are now online.Entirely new business models are emerging;three main ones were identified by the report’s authors.There is the so-called big deal,where institutional subscribers pay for access to a collection of online journal titles through site-licensing agreements.There is open-access publishing,typically supported by asking the author(or his employer)to pay for the paper to be published.Finally,there are open-access archives,where organizations such as universities or international laboratories support institutional repositories.Other models exist that are hybrids of these three,such as delayed open-access,where journals allow only subscribers to read a paper for the first six months,before making it freely available to everyone who wishes to see it.All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process,at least for the publication of papers.26.In the first paragraph,the author discusses

  • A.the background information of journal editing
  • B.the publication routine of laboratory reports
  • C.the relations of authors with journal publishers
  • D.the traditional process of journal publication

正确答案及解析

正确答案
D
解析

文章第一段主要介绍了一个具体的传统论文出版的流程,通常作为第一段的案例是作为铺垫以引出文章的主题,也是为了说明文章的中心,从后文我们可以看出文章谈到的是一个现代的出版模式,那么相对应,这里应该是谈到的传统的出版模式。由此可知D项为正确答案。A项错在editing一词上,第一段中并未涉及编辑期刊这一概念,而是在介绍传统的期刊出版,属于偷换概念故排除;B选项的“publication routine”,论述范围太窄,不能完全表达全文意思;同时,此段确实出现作者author与出版商publisher的关键词,

包含此试题的试卷

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

在社会规范学习与道德品质发展的研究中,班都拉(ABandura)等心理学家的研究重点是

  • A.道德认识
  • B.道德情感
  • C.道德意志
  • D.道德行为
查看答案
单选题

与悬浮-密实结构的沥青混合料相比,关于骨架-空隙结构的黏聚力和内摩擦角的说法,正确的是( )。

  • A.黏聚力大,内摩擦角大
  • B.黏聚力大,内摩擦角小
  • C.黏聚力小,内摩擦角大
  • D.黏聚力小,内摩擦角小
查看答案
单选题

雅各宾派也被称为()

  • A.沼泽派
  • B.平等派
  • C.忿激派
  • D.山岳派
查看答案
问答题

数学一,章节练习,考研数学高等数学部分

查看答案
问答题

数学一,章节练习,考研数学高等数学部分

查看答案

相关题库更多 +