A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “town of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for Zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in220m of investment and an avalanche of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain’s town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.
Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Liverpool in 2008. “A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow-village of culture? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?
It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community. The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.
It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgow’s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.
A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town's peculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.
What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?
- A.Skeptical
- B.Objective
- C.Favorable
- D.Critical
正确答案及解析
正确答案
解析
此题为观点题,最后一段指出作者认为“一个‘文化之城’不仅仅是艺术之城,而且要尊重一个城市的特色——帮助维持它的商业街,支持当地的设施,最重要的是赞美它的人民,并将其转化为行动”,所以作者是持积极赞成的态度,故D为正确答案。
包含此试题的试卷
你可能感兴趣的试题
在社会规范学习与道德品质发展的研究中,班都拉(ABandura)等心理学家的研究重点是
-
- A.道德认识
- B.道德情感
- C.道德意志
- D.道德行为
- 查看答案
与悬浮-密实结构的沥青混合料相比,关于骨架-空隙结构的黏聚力和内摩擦角的说法,正确的是( )。
-
- A.黏聚力大,内摩擦角大
- B.黏聚力大,内摩擦角小
- C.黏聚力小,内摩擦角大
- D.黏聚力小,内摩擦角小
- 查看答案
沥青混合料结构组成中,骨架-空隙结构的特点是( )。
-
- A.黏聚力较高,内摩擦角较小
- B.黏聚力较高,内摩擦角较大
- C.黏聚力较低,内摩擦角较大
- D.黏聚力较低,内摩擦角较小
- 查看答案
柔性路面主要代表是沥青类路面,其破坏主要取决于( )和极限垂直变形。
-
- A.剪切变形
- B.抗剪强度
- C.弯拉强度
- D.弯拉应变
- 查看答案
雅各宾派也被称为()
-
- A.沼泽派
- B.平等派
- C.忿激派
- D.山岳派
- 查看答案