Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer's job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer's lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that ____.（ ）
- A.many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
- B.students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
- C.students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
- D.many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
正确答案及解析
正确答案
解析
参考文章第二段，其中用了两个argue；表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
你可能感兴趣的试题
胆汁的生理作用不包括( )
-
- A.中和一部分胃酸
- B.乳化脂肪
- C.促进蛋白质的吸收
- D.促进脂肪酸的吸收
- E.K的吸收
- 查看答案
7月16日，我国智能科技领域的最高奖“（ ）人工智能科学技术奖”揭晓，共评出66个获奖项目成果。浙江大学潘云鹤院士在计算机美学、数字图书馆、智能城市等领域取得多项重大成果，荣获该奖项的最高成就奖。
-
- A.黄昆
- B.金怡濂
- C.谷超豪
- D.吴文俊
- 查看答案
近日，全国政协常委、中国佛教协会副会长、中国佛教协会西藏分会会长班禅额尔德尼·确吉杰布在西藏自治区拉萨市主持召开年轻活佛培养教育座谈会。班禅说，藏传佛教传承千年，是佛教（ ）的具体产物，是中华文化宝库中的一颗璀璨明珠。
-
- A.中国化
- B.制度化
- C.规范化
- D.程序化
- 查看答案
2022全球数字经济大会以“（ ）”为主题，定于7月28-30日在北京举办。
-
- A.启航数字文明——新要素、新规则、新格局
- B.激活数据价值 服务数字经济
- C.激发数据潜能 共赢数字未来
- D.发挥优势 共创未来——打造数字经济国际合作先行区
- 查看答案
7月12日下午，习近平来到新疆大学考察调研时强调，育人的根本在于（ ）。
-
- A.立德
- B.立学
- C.树人
- D.育才
- 查看答案